Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology


An Empirical Analysis of Foresters' Livelihood Satisfaction and Changes after the Collective Forest Right Reform

Jianfeng Zhou
School of Marxism, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou Fujian, 350108, China
Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology  2015  7:462-466
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.8.1545  |  © The Author(s) 2015
Received: March ‎13, ‎2014  |  Accepted: July ‎19, ‎2014  |  Published: June 20, 2015

Abstract

In this study, Sanming in Fujian was taken as an example and it mainly analyzed the change of farmers' livelihoods after the collective forest right system reform. The results were found that farmers’ livelihood strategy was changed from relying mainly on agricultural production to gradually focus on the accumulation and transformation, of financial capital. Moreover, principal component analysis was used to analyze which factors impacted on farmers’ livelihood. The results showed that whether having forestry right certification, forestry land quality, forestry land quantity have become the main performance of farmers livelihood changes.

Keywords:

Changes, collective forest right system reform, farmers,


References

  1. Chambers, R. and G.R. Conway, 1992. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.
  2. Chuanlei, L., 2007. Influence of collective forest right system reform on the production of bamboo shoots-based on a survey of Fujian province. M.A. Thesis, Renmin University of China, China.
  3. Ellis, F., 2000. Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Development Countries [M]. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp: 26-78.
  4. Lei, Z. and W. Caiyun, 2008. Influence of collective forest right system reform on the foresters' livelihood. Sci. Silvae Sinicare, 7(44): 73-78.
  5. Martha, Y.G., 2003. International progresses in sustainability research methods-comparison between the fragility analysis method and the sustainable livelihood method. Adv. Earth Sci., 2003(1).
  6. Shuifa, K. and W. Tali, 2005. Analysis on the relation of the forest right system reform progress, motivation and benefits in China. Green China, 20: 29-32.
  7. Stefan, S., 2001. Assessing Vulnerability to poverty, Jesus College and CSAE, Department of Economics, Oxford University, 2001.
    PMCid:PMC37349    
  8. Xiangzhi, K. and Z. Zhen, 2008. Analysis on the influence of rural tourism on farmers' livelihood [J]. Econ. Probl., 2008(1): 115-119.
  9. Yunyan, Y. and Z. Feng, 2005. Survey and analysis on foresters' livelihood capitals under the sustainable livelihood analysis framework. Issues in Agricultural Economy.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2042-4876
ISSN (Print):   2042-4868
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved