Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology


Nutritional Comparison of Beef, Pork and Chicken Meat from Maracaibo City (Venezuela)

1Alba P. Montalvo-Puente, 2Ramiro Torres-Gallo, 3Diofanor Acevedo-Correa, 3Piedad M. Montero-Castillo and 4Diego F. Tirado
1Department of Chemistry, School of Basic Sciences, Universidad de Cordoba, Via a Cerete, Cordoba
2Department of Agroindustrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidad del Atlantico, Via a to Puerto Colombia, Atlantico
3Group Nutricion, Salud y Calidad Alimentaria (NUSCA), Universidad de Cartagena, Avenida Consulado, Calle 30 No. 48-152, P.O. Box 130015, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia
4Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Av. Complutense s/n, P.O. Box 28040, Madrid, Spain
Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology  2018  SPL:218-224
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.14.5898  |  © The Author(s) 2018
Received: September 14, 2017  |  Accepted: December 26, 2017  |  Published: July 10, 2018

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the proximate composition, minerals and cholesterol content of cuts of Chicken Breast (CB), Longissimus Dorsi of Beef (LDB) and Longissimus Dorsi of Pork (LDP) to provide information that allows elucidating nutritional differences among these three meat cuts. The analysis was carried out for 150 samples, 50 per species, obtained from meat markets from Maracaibo (Venezuela). The highest concentration of lipids was found in CB (6.87 g/100 g fresh tissue), followed by LDP (4.76 g/100 g fresh tissue) and LDB (2.83 g/100 g fresh tissue). The same behaviour was found for moisture content, where CB, LDP and LDB had 75.05 g/100 g fresh tissue, 74.40 g/100 g fresh tissue and 73.29 g/100 g fresh tissue, respectively. On the other hand, the protein concentration in LDB (21.76 g/100 g fresh tissue) exceeded to LDP (20.94 g/100 g fresh tissue) and CB (20.50 g/100 g fresh tissue). The highest cholesterol content was observed in CB (73.42 mg/100 g), followed by LDB (70.22 mg/100 g) and LDP (65.42 mg/100 g). Iron (Fe) was lower in CB compared to LDB and LDP. LDP exceeded in calcium (Ca) content to LDB and CB. Species had an influence on the nutritional content of meat. The results of this research indicated that CB was not a recommendable option in low-fat dietary regimens due to its high content of total lipids and cholesterol; these results contrast with those obtained in LDP.

Keywords:

Cholesterol, Longissimus Dorsi, minerals, nutritional composition, proximate composition,


References

  1. Acevedo, D., P.M. Montero and J.D.C. Jaimes, 2015. Determination of antibiotics and microbiological quality of chicken meat commercialized in cartagena (Colombia). Inf. Tecnol., 26(1): 71-76.
    CrossRef    
  2. Albornoz-Gotera, A.J. and E.M. Segovia-López, 2014. Purchase - consumption habits of fresh pork meat in Maracaibo, Zulia State- Venezuela. Zootec. Trop., 32(2): 169-178.
  3. A.O.A.C., 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Edn., AOAC International, Maryland, USA.
  4. Arenas de Moreno, L., A. Vidal, D. Huerta-Sánchez, Y. Navas, S. Uzcátegui-Bracho and N. Huerta-Leidenz, 2000. Análisis comparativo proximal y de minerales entre carnes de iguana, pollo y res. Arch. Latinoam. Nutr., 50(4): 409-415.
  5. Arenas de Moreno, L., M. Giuffrida-Mendoza, L. Bulmes, S. Uzcátegui-Bracho, N. Huerta-Leidenz and N. Jerez'Timaure, 2008. Effect of strategic supplementation, implant regime and gender on the proximate and mineral composition of raw and cooked bovine meat. Rev. Cient. Veterinaria, 18(1): 65-72.
  6. Belaunzaran, X., R.J.B. Bessa, P. Lavín, A.R. Mantecón, J.K.G. Kramer and N. Aldai, 2015. Horse-meat for human consumption — Current research and future opportunities. Meat Sci., 108: 74-81.
    CrossRef    PMid:26047980    
  7. Brugiapaglia, A., C. Lussiana and G. Destefanis, 2014. Fatty acid profile and cholesterol content of beef at retail of Piemontese, Limousin and Friesian breeds. Meat Sci., 96(1): 568-573.
    CrossRef    PMid:24018276    
  8. Colle, M.J., R.P. Richard, K.M. Killinger, J.C. Bohlscheid, A.R. Gray, W.I. Loucks, R.N. Day, A.S. Cochran, J.A. Nasados and M.E. Doumit, 2015. Influence of extended aging on beef quality characteristics and sensory perception of steaks from the gluteus medius and longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci., 110: 32-39.
    CrossRef    PMid:26172241    
  9. Corliss, B., J.C. Brooks, J.N. Martin, A. Echeverry, A.R. Parks, S. Pokharel and M.M. Brashears, 2015. The influence of beef quality characteristics on the internalization and thermal susceptibility of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in blade-tenderized beef steaks. Meat Sci., 110: 85-92.
    CrossRef    PMid:26188361    
  10. Giuffrida-Mendoza, M., L. Arenas de Moreno, S. Uzcátegui-Bracho, G. Rincón-Villalobos and N. Huerta-Leidenz, 2007. Mineral content of longissimus dorsi thoracis from water buffalo and Zebu-influenced cattle at four comparative ages. Meat Sci., 75(3): 487-493.
    CrossRef    PMid:22063805    
  11. Giuffrida-Mendoza, M., L. Arenas de Moreno, N. Huerta-Leidenz, S. Uzcátegui-Bracho, K. Valero-Leal, S. Romero and A. Rodas-González, 2015. Cholesterol and fatty acid composition of longissimus thoracis from water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and Brahman-influenced cattle raised under savannah conditions. Meat Sci., 106: 44-49.
    CrossRef    PMid:25879797    
  12. Huerta-Montauti, D., V. Villa, L. Arenas de Moreno, A. Rodas-González, M. Giuffrida-Mendoza and N. Huerta-Leidenz, 2007. Proximate and mineral composition of imported versus domestic beef cuts for restaurant use in Venezuela. J. Muscle Foods, 18(3): 237-252.
    CrossRef    
  13. Institute of Medicine (US), 2011. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium. In: Ross, A.C., C.L. Taylor, A.L. Yaktine and H.B. Del Valle (Eds.), National Academies Press (US), Washington, D.C.
  14. Kamihiro, S., S. Stergiadis, C. Leifert, M.D. Eyre and G. Butler, 2015. Meat quality and health implications of organic and conventional beef production. Meat Sci., 100: 306-318.
    CrossRef    PMid:25460141    
  15. Kim, Y.H., C. Liesse, R. Kemp and P. Balan, 2015. Evaluation of combined effects of ageing period and freezing rate on quality attributes of beef loins. Meat Sci., 110: 40-45.
    CrossRef    PMid:26172242    
  16. National Institute of Nutrition, 2016. Tabla de composición de Alimentos para uso práctico. Pub. L. No. 54, Caracas, Venezuela.
  17. Naveena, B.M., S. Vaithiyanathan, M. Muthukumar, A.R. Sen, Y.P. Kumar, M. Kiran, V.A. Shaju and K.R. Chandran, 2013. Relationship between the solubility, dosage and antioxidant capacity of carnosic acid in raw and cooked ground buffalo meat patties and chicken patties. Meat Sci., 95(2): 195-202.
    CrossRef    PMid:23743029    Direct Link
  18. Owusu-Sekyere, E., V. Owusu and H. Jordaan, 2014. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for beef food safety assurance labels in the Kumasi metropolis and Sunyani municipality of Ghana. Food Control, 46: 152-159.
    CrossRef    
  19. Roseland, J.M., Q.V. Nguyen, J.R. Williams, L.W. Douglass, K.Y. Patterson, J.C. Howe et al., 2015. Protein, fat, moisture and cooking yields from a U.S. study of retail beef cuts. J. Food Compos. Anal., 43: 131-139.
    CrossRef    
  20. Rueda-Sánchez, A., J.D. Benavides-Solorio, J.T. Saenz-Reyez, H.J. Mu-oz-Flores, J.A. Prieto-Ruiz and G. Orozco Gutiérrez, 2014. Quality of plants produced in forest nurseries of Nayarit. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Forestales, 5(22): 58-73.
    CrossRef    
  21. Sakaridis, I., I. Ganopoulos, A. Argiriou and A. Tsaftaris, 2013. A fast and accurate method for controlling the correct labeling of products containing buffalo meat using High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis. Meat Sci., 94(1): 84-88.
    CrossRef    PMid:23403299    
  22. Scollan, N.D., D. Dannenberger, K. Nuernberg, I. Richardson, S. MacKintosh, J.F. Hocquette and A.P. Moloney, 2014. Enhancing the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Sci., 97(3): 384-394.
    CrossRef    PMid:24697921    
  23. Searcy, R.L. and L.M. Bergquist, 1960. A new color reaction for the quantitation of serum cholesterol. Clin. Chim. Acta, 5(2): 192-199.
    CrossRef    
  24. Segovia-López, E., A. Albornoz-Gotera and L. Ortega-Soto, 2007. Factors that determine the selection of the beef purchase place in Maracaibo, Venezuela. Rev. Cient., 17(4): 366-371.
  25. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2005. Dietary Guidelines for Americans. U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington D.C., pp: 84.
  26. Uzcátegui-Bracho, S., A. Rodas-González, K. Hennig, L. Arenas de Moreno, M. Leal, J. Vergara-López and N. Jerez-Timaure, 2008. Proximate composition, mineral and cholesterol content of the Longissimus dorsi muscle of criollo limonero steers supplemented on pasture. Rev. Cient. Veterinaria, 18(5): 589-594.
  27. Uzcátegui-Bracho, S., M. Giuffrida-Mendoza, L. Arenas de Moreno and N. Jerez-Timaure, 2010. Proximate, lipids and cholesterol content of beef, porkand chicken meat obtained from meat-retail stores located southern area of Maracaibo City. Rev. Venez. Tecnol. Soc., 3(1): 13-29.
  28. Xu, L., M.L. He, R.F. Liang, T.A. McAllister and W.Z. Yang, 2014. Effects of grain source and monensin level on growth performance, carcass traits and fatty acid profile in feedlot beef steers. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 198: 141-150.
    CrossRef    
  29. Zbrun, M.V., C. Olivero, A. Romero-Scharpen, E. Rossler, L.P. Soto, D.M. Astesana, J.E. Blajman, A. Berisvil, M.L. Signorini and L.S. Frizzo, 2015. Antimicrobial resistance in thermotolerant Campylobacter isolated from different stages of the poultry meat supply chain in Argentina. Food Control, 57: 136-141.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2042-4876
ISSN (Print):   2042-4868
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved