Abstract

As the Education industry becoming more competitive these days, the institutions of higher education is competing to attract students by providing better e-Services Quality (e-SQ) which can improve their relationship and enhance their satisfaction. However, measuring e-SQ and satisfaction is a complex process because they relate to users feelings which cannot be predicted and measured easily. This study aims to develop a measurement scale for hypothesized conceptual model of e-service quality and user satisfaction relationship in Malaysian universities. The hypothesized conceptual model utilises Expectancy Disconfirmation Theory model (EDT), which is based on expected outcome and perceived performance of e-services quality. Nine dimensions of e-SQ are proposed for this model based on reviewing and analysing the related literature, especially the common e-SQ measures. The dimensions include efficiency, availability, privacy/security, fulfilment, reliability, web design, interactivity, information and ease of use. A structured questionnaire is conducted in five Malaysian universities to achieve the first stage of the hypothesized model related to evaluating the dimensions and defining the significant ones suitable for evaluating the expected outcome and perceived performance of e-Service Quality (e-SQ). These dimensions represent a core of a proper scale for the quality of e-services in higher education in Malaysia and will help to measure the students’ satisfactions in the target domain.

Keywords:

Expectancy disconfirmation theory, e-service quality, e-service quality dimension, users,

References

1. Ahmadi, S.A., N. Barkhordar, A.M. Firoozabadi and A. Dolatkhah, 2008. Measurement of e-service quality in university website. Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
   
2. Alanezi, M.A., A. Kamil and S. Basri, 2010. A proposed instrument dimensions for measuring e-government service quality. Int. J. u-and e-Serv., 3(4): 1-18.
   
3. Al-hawari, M., 2008. The influence of traditional service quality factors on customer satisfaction: A practical study within the context of Australian banking. Bus. Rev., 11(2): 114-119.
   
4. Al-Nuaimi, I.T.I., A.K. Bin Mahmood, L.T. Jung and H.H. Jebur, 2013. A review of e-service quality dimensions in user satisfaction. Proceeding of the International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS, 2013), pp: 186-191.
   CrossRef    
5. Al-Nuaimi, I.T.I., A.K. Bin Mahmood and H.H. Jebur, 2014. Proposed conceptual model for E-service quality in Malaysian universities. Proceeding of the International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS, 2014), pp: 1-6.
   
6. Al-Tarawneh, K.A., 2012. Measuring e-service quality from the customers' perspective: An empirical study on banking services. Int. Res. J. Financ. Econ., 91: 123.
   
7. Angell, R.J., T.W. Heffernan and P. Megicks, 2008. Service quality in postgraduate education. Qual. Assurance Educ., 16(3): 236-254.
   CrossRef    
8. Bakri, A. and N. Elkhani, 2012. Review on Expectancy Disconfirmation Theory (EDT) model in B2C E-commerce. J. Inform. Syst. Res. Innov. (JISRI), 2: 1-13.
   
9. Balasubramanian, S., P. Konana and N.M. Menon, 2003. Customer satisfaction in virtual environments: A study of online investing. Manage. Sci., 49(7): 871-889.
   CrossRef    
10. Boshoff, C., 2007. A psychometric assessment of ES-QUAL: A scale to measure electronic service quality. J. Electron. Commerc. Res., 8(1): 101-114.
    
11. Bressolles, G. and F. Durrieu, 2011. Service quality, customer value and satisfaction relationship revisited for online wine websites. Proceeding of the 6th AWBR International Conference. Bordeaux Management School.
    
12. Bressolles, G. and J. Nantel, 2008. The measurement of electronic service quality: Improvements and application. Int. J. E-Bus. Res. (IJEBR), 4(3): 1-19.
    CrossRef    
13. Chandrashekaran, M., K. Rotte, S.S. Tax and R. Grewal, 2007. Satisfaction strength and customer loyalty. J. Marketing Res., 44(1): 153-163.
    CrossRef    
14. Didegah, F. and M.A. Erfanmanesh, 2010. The study of Malaysian public Universities' performance on the World Wide Web. Library Hi Tech News, 27(3): 7-11.
    CrossRef    
15. Fassnacht, M. and I. Koese, 2006. Quality of electronic services conceptualizing and testing a hierarchical model. J. Serv. Res., 9(1): 19-37.
    CrossRef    
16. Festinger, L., 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
    
17. George, D. and P. Mallery, 2005. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. Person Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp: 408.
    
18. Herington, C. and S. Weaven, 2009. E-retailing by banks: E-service quality and its importance to customer satisfaction. Eur. J. Marketing, 43(9/10): 1220-1231.
    CrossRef    
19. Ibok, I.N. and A.S. John, 2013. Investigating customer satisfaction driven values in the retail banking industry. Int. J. Financ. Account., 2(5): 292-296.
    
20. Ibrahim, M.Z., M.N.A. Rahman and R.M. Yasin, 2012. Assessing students perceptions of service quality in Technical Educational and Vocational Training (TEVT) institution in Malaysia. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 56: 272-283.
    CrossRef    
21. Jayasundara, C.C., 2009. Developing a model for predicting customer satisfaction in relation to service quality in university libraries in Sri Lanka. Ph.D. Thesis, University of South Africa.
    
22. Jebur, H., H. Gheysari and P. Roghanian, 2012. E-commerce reality and controversial issue. Int. J. Fundamental Psychol. Soc. Sci., 2(4): 74-79.
    
23. Jun, Z., C. Liangliang and L. Fubin, 2009. E-S-QUAL: Its applicability in evaluating e-government web sites service quality. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce (IEEC'09), pp: 515-518.
    CrossRef    
24. Kim, M., J.H. Kim and S.J. Lennon, 2006. Online service attributes available on apparel retail web sites: An E-S-QUAL approach. Manag. Serv. Qual., 16(1): 51-77.
    CrossRef    
25. Kotler, P., 2000. Marketing Management. 10th Edn., Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
    PMCid:PMC101036    
26. Ladhari, R., 2009. A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci., 1(2): 172-198.
    CrossRef    
27. Lankton, N.K. and H.D. McKnight, 2012. Examining two expectation disconfirmation theory models: Assimilation and asymmetry effects. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 13(2): 88-115.
    
28. Lee, G.G. and H.F. Lin, 2005. Customer perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping. Int. J. Retail Distribut. Manage., 33(2): 161-176.
    CrossRef    
29. Levitt, T., 1983. The Marketing Imagination. Free Press, New York, pp: 116.
    
30. Li, H. and R. Suomi, 2008. Dimensions of e-service quality: An alternative model. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Future Generation Communication and Networking Symposia (FGCNS'08), 1: 29-35.
    CrossRef    
31. Li, H. and R. Suomi, 2009. A proposed scale for measuring e-service quality. Int. J. u-and e-Serv. Sci. Technol., 2(1): 1-10.
    
32. Li, H., Y. Liu and R. Suomi, 2009. Measurement of E-service Quality: An Empirical Study in Online Travel Service. Proceedings of ECIS 2009. Paper No. 191.
    
33. Nyshadham, E.A. and M.C. Obi, 2009. Development and validation of a scale for measuring e-government user satisfaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Nova Southeastern University.
    
34. Ojasalo, J., 2010. E-service quality: A conceptual model. Int. J. Arts Sci., 3(7): 127-143.
    
35. Parasuraman, A., V.A. Zeithaml and L.L. Berry, 1985. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing, 49(4): 41-50.
    CrossRef    
36. Parasuraman, A., V.A. Zeithaml and L. Berry, 1988. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retailing, 64(1): 12-40.
    
37. Parasuraman, A., L.L. Berry and V.A. Zeithaml, 1991. Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J. Retailing, 67(4): 420-450.
    
38. Picazo-Vela, S., 2010. The Effect of Online Reviews on Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation Disconfirmation Approach. AMCIS 2009 Doctoral Consortium, Paper No. 6.
    
39. Pitt, L.F., R.T. Watson and C.B. Kavan, 1997. Measuring information systems service quality: Concerns for a complete canvas. MIS Quart., 21(2): 209-221.
    CrossRef    
40. Prybutok, V.R., L.A. Kappelman and B.L. Myers, 1997. A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: Toward a theory for information systems assessment. Inform. Resour. Manage. J., 10(1): 6-26.
    CrossRef    
41. Raman, M., R. Stephenaus, N. Alam and M. Kuppusamy, 2008. Information technology in Malaysia: E-service quality and uptake of internet banking. J. Internet Bank. Commerc., 13(2): 1-18.
    
42. Ranganathan, C. and S. Ganapathy, 2002. Key dimensions of business-to-consumer web sites. Inform. Manage., 39(2): 457-465.
    CrossRef    
43. Santos, J., 2003. E-service quality: A model of virtual service quality dimensions. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J., 13(3): 233-246.
    CrossRef    
44. Seth, N., S.G. Deshmukh and P. Vrat, 2005. Service quality models: A review. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 22(9): 913-949.
    CrossRef    
45. Shekarchizadeh, A., A. Rasli and H. Hon-Tat, 2011. SERVQUAL in Malaysian universities: Perspectives of international students. Bus. Process Manage. J., 17(1): 67-81.
    CrossRef    
46. Sivadass, E. and J.L. Baker-Prewitt, 2000. An examination of the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and store loyalty. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manage., 28(2): 73-82.
    CrossRef    
47. Sultan, P. and H.Y. Wong, 2010. Performance-based service quality model: An empirical study on Japanese universities. Qual. Assurance Edus., 18(2): 126-143.
    CrossRef    
48. Sultan, P. and H.Y. Wong, 2011. Service quality in higher education context: Antecedents and dimensions. Int. Rev. Bus. Res. Papers, 7(2): 11-20.
    
49. Sunanto, S., T. Taufiqurrahman and R. Pangemanan, 2007. An analysis of university service quality gap and student satisfaction in Indonesia. Int. J. Knowl. Cult. Change Manage., 7(7): 1-10.
    CrossRef    
50. Sung, Y.S., S.H. Liu, H.L. Liao and C.M. Liu, 2009. Service quality between e-government users and administrators. I-Ways J. E-Govern. Pol. Regulat., 32: 241-248.
    
51. Suuroja, M., 2003. Service Quality-main Conceptualizations and Critique. Tartu University Press, Tartu.
    PMid:14578640    
52. Tan, K.C., M. Xie and Y.N. Li, 2003. A service quality framework for web-based information systems. TQM Mag., 15(3): 164-172.
    CrossRef    
53. Udo, G.J., K.K. Bagchi and P.J. Kirs, 2010. An assessment of customers' e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention. Int. J. Inform. Manage., 30(6): 481-492.
    CrossRef    
54. Vanpariya, B. and V. Patel, 2010. Assessing Electronic Service Quality through E-S-QUAL Scale. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/384582/Assessing_Electronic_Service_Quality_through_E-S-QUAL_Scale.
    Direct Link
55. Van Riel, A., J. Semeijn and W. Janssen, 2003. E-service quality expectations: A case study. Total Qual. Manag. Bus., 14(4): 437-450.
    CrossRef    
56. Wachter, K., 2002. Longitudinal assessment of web retailers: Issues from a consumer point of view. J. Fashion Market. Manage. Int. J, 6(2): 134-145.
    CrossRef    
57. Watson, R.T., L.F. Pitt and C.B. Kavan, 1998. Measuring information systems service quality: Lessons from two longitudinal case studies. MIS Quarterly, 22(1): 61-79.
    CrossRef    
58. Woodruff, R.B., E.R. Cadotte and R.L. Jenkins, 1983. Modeling consumer satisfaction processes using experience-based norms. J. Marketing Res., 20(3): 296-304.
    CrossRef    
59. Yang, Z. and X. Fang, 2004. Online service quality dimensions and their relationships with satisfaction: A content analysis of customer reviews of securities brokerage services. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag., 15(3): 302-326.
    CrossRef    
60. Yang, Z., R.T. Peterson and L. Huang, 2001. Taking the pulse of internet pharmacies. Mark. Health Serv., 21(2): 4-10.
    PMid:11406905    
61. Yang, Z., R.T. Peterson and S. Cai, 2003. Services quality dimensions of Internet retailing: An exploratory analysis. J. Serv. Mark., 17(7): 685-700.
    CrossRef    
62. Yoo, B. and N. Donthu, 2001. Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an Internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Q. J. Electron. Commerc., 2(1): 31-47.
    
63. Zeithaml, V.A., L.L. Berry and A. Parasuraman, 1993. The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. J. Acad. Market. Sci., 21: 1.
    CrossRef    
64. Zeithaml, V.A., A. Parasuraman and A. Malhotra, 2001. A Conceptual Framework for Understanding e-service Quality: Implications for Future Research and Managerial Practice. MSI Working Paper Series No. 00-115, Cambridge, MA, pp: 1-49.
    
65. Zeithaml, V.A., 2002. Service excellence in electronic channels. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J., 12(3): 135-139.
    CrossRef    
66. Zeithaml, V.A., A. Parasuraman and A. Malhotra, 2002. Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. J. Acad. Market. Sci., 30: 362.
    CrossRef    
67. Zhang, X. and V.R. Prybutok, 2005. A consumer perspective of e-service quality. IEEE T. Eng. Manage., 52(4): 461-477.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.