Abstract

This study analyzes students' main difficulties in learning the concept of internal energy and related concepts. To carry out this analysis we have supposed that the historical study of the main qualitative leaps that have taken place in the construction of the theory of internal energy may help to diagnose such difficulties. Thus, we have made a brief description of the main conceptual profiles with in which internal energy can be interpreted by Ethiopian and examined to what extent they are used by students in two public universities. To achieve this we have devised and applied an open-ended questionnaire and interviews. The results obtained showed that most students, in the two universities, have ontological and epistemological difficulties using the idea of internal energy thus preferring the use of reasoning based on the chemical thermodynamics concepts in chemistry.

Keywords:

Conceptual understanding, internal energy , learning difficulties,

References

1. Barker, V. and R. Millar, 2000. Student's reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? Int. J. Sci. Educ., 22: 1171-12000.
   CrossRef    
2. Beall, H., 1994. Probing student misconception in thermodynamics with in-class writing. J. Chem. Educ., 71(12).
   CrossRef    
3. Bodner, G., 1991. I have found you an argument, the conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students. J. Chem. Educ., 68: 385-388.
   CrossRef    
4. Boo, H.K., 1998. Students' understandings of chemical bonds and the energetic of chemical reactions. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 35(5): 569-581.
   CrossRef    
5. Carson, J. and J. Waston, 1999. Undergraduate student's understandings of enthalpy change. Univ., Chem. Educ., 3: 46-51.
   
6. Chabay, R.W. and B. Sherwood, 2006. Restructuring the introductory electricity and magnetism course. Am. J. Phys., 74: 329-336.
   CrossRef    
7. Chang, R. and K. Goldsby, 2012. Chemistry. 11th Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York.
   
8. Driver, R., 1989. Student's conception and the learning of science. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 11(5): 481-490.
   CrossRef    
9. Duit, R., 1987. Research on students' alternative frameworks in science topics, theoretical frameworks, consequences for science teaching. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar: Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, pp: 150-162.
   
10. Erickson, G. and A. Tiberghien, 1985. Heat and Temperature. In: Driver, R., E. Guesne and A. Tiberghiere (Eds.), Children's Ideas in Science. Open University Press, Philadelphia.
    
11. Furio, C. and J. Guisasola, 1998. Difficulties in learning the concept of electric field. Sci. Educ., 82: 511-526.
    CrossRef    
12. Jin, H. and C.W. Anderson, 2012. A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 49: 1149-1180.
    CrossRef    
13. Kaper, W. and M. Goedhart, 2002. Forms of energy', an intermediary language on the road to thermodynamics? Part I. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 24: 81-95.
    CrossRef    
14. Lancor, R.A., 2012. Using student-generated analogies to investigate conceptions of energy: A multidisciplinary study. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 36(1): 1-23.
    CrossRef    
15. Loverude, M.E., 2005. Student understanding of gravitational potential energy and the motion of bodies in a gravitational field. AIP Conf. Proc., 790: 77-80.
    CrossRef    
16. MOE, 2009. Ethiopian higher education harmonized curriculum for B.Sc. degree program in chemistry.
    
17. Nahum, T.L., R. Mamlok-Naaman, A. Hofstein and J. Krajcik, 2007. Developing a new teaching approach for the chemical bonding concept aligned with current scientific and pedagogical knowledge. Sci. Educ., 91: 579-603.
    CrossRef    
18. Pushkin, D., 1998. Introductory students, conceptual understanding and algorithmic success. J. Chem. Educ., 75(7): 809-810, 275, 279.
    
19. Ramsden, P., 1992. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. Routledge, NY.
    CrossRef    
20. Ribelro, G., 1992. Entropy and the second principle of thermodynamics fourth year undergraduates ideas, research in assessment. Royal Soc. Chem., 9: 23-36, 210.
    
21. Selepe, E. and J. Bradley, 1997. Student teacher's conceptual difficulties in chemical thermodynamics. In: Sanders, M. (Ed.), SAARMSE 5th Annual Meeting. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, pp: 316-321.
    
22. Sam M., 2007. Student understanding of potential Energy diagrams in Quantum mechanics, PER Seminar Colorado School of mines October 30.
    
23. Shen, J. and M.C. Linn, 2011. A technology-enhanced unit of modeling static electricity: Integrating scientific explanations and everyday observations. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 33: 1597-1623.
    CrossRef    
24. Taber, K.S., 1998. An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 20: 597-608.
    CrossRef    
25. Thomas, P.L., 1997. Student conceptions of equilibrium and fundamental thermodynamic concepts in college physical chemistry. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, USA.
    
26. Thomas, P.L. and R.W. Schwenz, 1998. College physical chemistry students' conceptions of equilibrium and fundamental thermodynamics. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 35(10): 1151-1160.
    CrossRef    
27. Vanessa, K., 2004. Beyond Appearances: Students' Misconceptions About Basic Chemical Ideas. 2nd Edn., Durham.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.