Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology


Hybrid ILC Strategy for Magnetic Ball Suspension System

1S. Sathiyavathi, 1K. Krishnamurthy, 2P.K. Bhaba and 3S. Somasundaram
1Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, India
2Department of Chemical Engineering
3Department of Instrumentation Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, India
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology  2014  20:4355-4358
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.808  |  © The Author(s) 2014
Received: January 07, 2014  |  Accepted: February 06, 2014  |  Published: May 20, 2014

Abstract

Controlling of magnetic ball suspension system using hybrid Iterative Learning Controller (ILC) is investigated in this study. Hybrid ILC modifies the control input for the next iteration by learning from the present input and the errors of previous iteration without reconfiguration of the existing Proportional, Integral and Derivative (PID) controller. Firstly, hybrid ILC is employed to stabilize the ball and then set point tracking is performed to evaluate the efficacy of the controller. The effectiveness of designed hybrid ILC is analyzed based on performance indices via simulation.

Keywords:

Compensator, hybrid ILC, magnetic ball suspension system, PID controller,


References

  1. Ahmed, E.H. and M. Ouladsine, 2001. Modeling and nonlinear control of magnetic levitation systems. IEEE T. Ind. Electron., 48: 831-838.
    CrossRef    
  2. Lee, S.H., H.K. Sung, J.T. Lim and Z. Bien, 2000. Self-tuning control of electromagnetic levitation systems. Control Eng. Pract., 8: 749-756.
    CrossRef    
  3. Lin, J.L. and B.C. Tho, 1998. Analysis and μ-based controller design for an electromagnetic suspension system. IEEE T. Educ., 41: 116-129.
    CrossRef    
  4. Liu, T., F. Gao and Y. Wang, 2010. IMC-based iterative learning control for batch processes with uncertain time delay. J. Process Contr., 23: 173-180.
    CrossRef    
  5. Ming, G., M.S. Chiu and Q.G. Wang, 2002. Robust PID controller design via LMI approach. J. Process Contr., 12: 3-13.
    CrossRef    
  6. O'Dwyer, A., 2006. Hand Book of PI-PID Controller Tuning Rules. Imperial College Press, London.
    CrossRef    
  7. Rotstein, G.E. and D.R. Lewin, 1991. Simple PI and PID tuning for openloop unstable systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30: 1864-1869.
    CrossRef    
  8. Tayebi, S.A., M.B. Zaremba and Y. Ye, 2008. Robust iterative learning control design: Application to a robot manipulator. IEEE-ASME T. Mech., 13: 608-613.
  9. Visioli, A., 2004. A new design for a PID plus feedforward controller. J. Process Contr., 14: 457-463.
    CrossRef    
  10. Wang, Y., Y. Yang and Z. Zhao, 2013. Robust stability analysis for an enhanced ILC-based PI controller. J. Process Contr., 23: 201-214.
    CrossRef    
  11. Xu, J.X., T.H. Lee and H.W. Zhang, 2004. Analysis and comparison of iterative learning control schemes. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 17: 675-686.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2040-7467
ISSN (Print):   2040-7459
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved