Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental impacts of a newly designed precast Ultra-High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) cantilever retaining wall as a sustainable alternative approach compared with the conventional precast Reinforced Concrete (RC) cantilever retaining wall. Nowadays, according to the shocking reports of many researchers worldwide global warming is one of the most devastating problems of human being. To date, lots of research has been undertaken in the concrete industry to tackle this issue through reducing the environmental footprints of our structural designs. In this regard, UHPFRC technology offers substantial benefits through efficient use of materials as well as optimization of the structural designs resulting less CO2 emissions, Embodied Energy (EE) and Global Warming Potential (GWP). UHPFRC as a sustainable construction material is mostly appropriate for the use in the fabrication of precast members such as precast concrete cantilever retaining walls. This study demonstrates the overview of the designed precast concrete cantilever retaining wall manufactured from UHPFRC and its Environmental Impact Calculations (EIC) versus the conventional precast RC cantilever retaining walls. Based on the EIC results, the precast UHPFRC cantilever retaining walls are generally more environmentally sustainable than those built of the conventional RC with respect to the reduction of CO2 emissions, EE and GWP. In summary, the precast UHPFRC cantilever retaining wall proposed in this study is an alternative sustainable solution compared with the conventional precast RC cantilever retaining wall which can be used in many civil engineering projects.

Keywords:

CO₂ emissions, Embodied Energy (EE), Global Warming Potential (GWP), precast cantilever retaining wall, sustainability, Ultra High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC),

References

1. BS 8002, 1994. Code of Practice for Earth Retaining Structures. British Standards, UK.
   
2. BS EN 1992-1-1:2004, 2004. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures- Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. British Standards, UK.
   
3. BS EN 1997-1:2004, 2004. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design-Part 1: General Rules. British Standards, UK.
   
4. Elrod, M., 1999. Greenhouse warming potential model. J. Chem. Educ., 76: 1702-1705.
   CrossRef    
5. Fehling, E., M. Schmidt and S. Sturwald, 2008. Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC). Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete. Kassel, Germany.
   
6. Graybeal, B., 2006. Material Property Characterization of Ultra High-performance Concrete. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Publication No: FHWA-HRT-06-103.
   
7. Huntzinger, D.N. and T.D. Eatmon, 2009. A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: Comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. J. Clean. Prod., 17(7): 668-675.
   CrossRef    
8. JSCE No. 9, 2006. Recommendations for design and construction of ultra high strength fiber reinforced concrete structures (Draft). JSCE Guideline for Concrete, No. 9: Concrete Committee of Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE).
   
9. Mosley, W.H., J.H. Bungey and R. Hulse, 2007. Reinforced Concrete Design to Eurocode. 6 Edn., Palgrave MacMillan, pp: 434.
   
10. Murthy, V., 2003. Geotechnical Engineering: Principles and Practices of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Dekker, New York.
    
11. Nematollahi, B., 2012. Structural behavior and environmental impacts of precast ultra-high performance ductile concrete cantilever retaining walls. M.Sc. Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Malaysia.
    
12. Richard, P. and M. Cheyrezy, 1994. Reactive powder concretes with high ductility and 200-800 MPa compressive strength. Int. Concrete Res. Inform. Portal, 144: 507-507.
    
13. Richard, P. and M. Cheyrezy, 1995. Composition of reactive powder concretes. Cement Concrete Res., 25(7): 1501-1511.
    CrossRef    
14. Schmidt, M., E. Fehling and C. Geisenhansluke, 2004. Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete. Kassel University Press, Kassel, Germany.
    
15. Struble, J. and J. Godfrey, 2004. How sustainable is concrete? Proceedings of the International Workshop on Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology. Beijing.
    
16. Voo, Y.L. and S.J. Foster, 2010. Characteristics of ultra-high performance 'ductile'concrete and its impact on sustainable construction. IES J. A: Civ. Struct. Eng., 3(3): 168-187.
    
17. Voo, Y.L., S.J. Foster and R.I. Gilbert, 2006. Shear strength of fiber reinforced reactive powder concrete prestressed girders without stirrups. J. Adv. Concrete Technol., 4(1): 123-132.
    CrossRef    
18. Voo, Y.L., W.K. Poon and S.J. Foster, 2010. Shear strength of steel fiber-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete beams without stirrups. J. Struct. Eng., 136(11): 1393-1400.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.