Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology


Controlling Cost Overrun Factors in Construction Projects in Malaysia

1Ade Asmi Abdul Azis, 2Aftab Hameed Memon, 2Ismail Abdul Rahman and 2Ahmad Tarmizi Abd. Karim
1Universitas Bakrie, Indonesia
2Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology  2013  8:2621-2629
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.5.4706  |  © The Author(s) 2013
Received: September 03, 2012  |  Accepted: September 02, 2012  |  Published: March 15, 2013

Abstract

Poor cost performance in construction project is a common problem worldwide resulting in significant amount of cost overrun. This led us to explore the major contributors of cost overrun and propose mitigation measures to control cost overrun factors. Since, there were very few studies on cost issues in construction projects in Malaysia, hence this study was carried out in Malaysia using qualitative research method using semi-structured interview with experienced personnel’s involved in handling construction projects. A total of 21 respondents from client, consultant and contractor organizations were interviewed and requested to evaluate the eight (8) categories of cost overrun factors determined from the author’s previous work. Out of the eight categories of cost overrun factors, the respondents had ranked “contractor's site management” as most severe contributor of cost overrun and followed by “information and communication” category while the least severe category is financial management. Besides that the respondents are also requested to propose and classify mitigation measures for cost control according to suitable implementation strategies. This resulted in 15 proposals on mitigation measures and these were classified in three implementation strategies. The results indicated that among these 15 mitigation measures, five measures are classified as pro-active strategy and four measures are classified as organizational strategy. While other six measures are classified as fluid measures which can be adopted in more than one strategy.

Keywords:

Construction industry, cost performance, implementation strategy, mitigation measure,


References


Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2040-7467
ISSN (Print):   2040-7459
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved