Abstract

Interfacial tension of reservoir fluids and wettability are important parameters in the process of enhanced oil recovery. These two parameters affect the fluid distribution within reservoir formation. The fluids distribution in the reservoir strongly affects the flow behavior and residual oil recovery. Interfacial tension plays an important role due to its relationship between foam surface energy and foam stability. The wettability by contact angle measurement provides a method for determining fluid interaction and is considered as a basic research than practical tool for analysis of reservoir formation. The main objective of this research study is to determine the effects of interfacial tension and wettability on foam surfactant blend formulations, brine and crude oil. Anionic and nonionic surfactant blend were selected. The interfacial tension test was performed at 85oC. Dynamic interfacial tension of blended surfactant formulations with Malaysian crude oil were measured in fixed brine salinity. The interfacial tension values of tested surfactant blends were found lower than the interfacial tension between brine and crude oil. Interracial tension between crude oil and foam forming surfactant was reduced by using different concentration of surfactant blend. Good values were obtained by the measurement of contact angle between solid and three foam surfactant blend formulations. The interfacial tension and contact angle experimental studies revealed that, the blend of Alpha Olefin Sulfonate and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfonate with Octylphenol Ethylene Oxide play an important role in reducing the interfacial tension at crude oil-brine interface. The reduced interfacial tension and more wetting surface effects indicated that, these foam surfactant formulations are of great importance in the process of residual oil recovery.

Keywords:

Foam, interfacial tension, surfactants, residual oil recovery, wettability,

References

1. Abdallah, W., J.S. Buckley, A. Carnegie, J. Edwards, B. Herold, E. Fordham and C. Signer, 1986. Fundamentals of wettability. Technology, 38(1125-1144): 268.
   
2. Alotaibi, M.B. and H.A. Nasr-El-Din, 2009. Effect of brine salinity on reservoir fluids interfacial tension. Proceedings of the EUROPEC/EAG Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, Netherland.
   
3. Arashiro, E.Y. and N.R. Demarquette, 1999. Use of the pendant drop method to measure interfacial tension between molten polymers. Mat. Res., 2(1): 23-32. http: //www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1516-1439 1999000100005&script=sci_ arttext.
   Direct Link
4. Babu, K., N. Pal, A. Bera, V. Saxena and A. Mandal, 2015. Studies on interfacial tension and contact angle of synthesized surfactant and polymeric from castor oil for enhanced oil recovery. Appl. Surf. Sci., 353: 1126-1136. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0169433215015445.
   CrossRef    Direct Link
5. Bera, A., T. Kumar, K. Ojha and A. Mandal, 2014. Screening of microemulsion properties for application in enhanced oil recovery. Fuel, 121: 198-207. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0016236113011952.
   CrossRef    Direct Link
6. Bian, Y., G.S. Penny and N.C. Sheppard, 2012. Surfactant formulation evaluation for carbon dioxide foam flooding in heterogeneous sandstone reservoir. Proceedings of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, pp: 1-16. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ SPE-154018-MS.
   Direct Link
7. Dandekar, A.Y., 2006. Petroleum Reservoir Rock and Fluid Properties. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York. https://books.google. com.pk/books?isbn=1420004549.
   Direct Link
8. Farajzadeh, R., R.M. Muruganathan, W.R. Rossen and R. Krastev, 2011. Effect of gas type on foam film permeability and its implications for foam flow in porous media. Adv. Colloid Interfac., 168(1-2): 71-78. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496 785.
   Direct Link
9. Gao, B. and M.M. Sharma, 2013. A family of alkyl sulfate gemini surfactants. 2. Water-oil interfacial tension reduction. J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 407: 375-381. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0021979713006346.
   CrossRef    PMid:23895947    Direct Link
10. Guo, H., P.L.J. Zitha, R. Faber and M. Buijse, 2013. A novel alkaline/surfactant/foam enhanced oil recovery process. SPE J., 17(4): 1186-1195. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/270441531_A_Novel_AlkalineSurfactantFoam_Enhanced_Oil_Recovery_Process.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
11. Hargreaves, T., 2003. Chemical Formulation: An Overview of Surfactant Based Preparations Used in Everyday Life. Royal Society of Chemistry, London, Vol. 32. https://books.google.com. pk/books?isbn = 1119961092.
    Direct Link
12. Hezave, A.Z., S. Dorostkar, S. Ayatollahi, M. Nabipour and B. Hemmateenejad, 2013. Dynamic interfacial tension behavior between heavy crude oil and ionic liquid solution (1-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([C12mim][Cl]+ distilled or saline water/heavy crude oil)) as a new surfactant. J. Mol. Liq., 187: 83-89. http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0167732213001761.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
13. Holt, T. and T.S. Kristiansen, 1990. Improved sweep effeciency during gas injection-mobility control. Proceedins of the Summaries of Papers for the SPOR Seminar, NPD, Stavanger, pp: 59-77. https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=9JMrTZxPd2MC&pg=PA410&lpg=PA410&dq=Improve+sweep+efficiency+during+gas+injection - mobility+ control&source=bl&ots= -dHjBhSg_T&sig=JILsz_ zIOoA3Vpl3IZK43tADcpE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwivzL6_u73JAhVHao4KHVxFCboQ6AEITTAH#v=onepage&q=Improve%20sweep%20efficiency%20 during%20gas%20injection-mobility% 20control&f=false.
    Direct Link
14. Khalil, F. and K. Asghari, 2006. Application of CO-foam as a means of reducing carbon dioxide mobility. J. Can. Petrol. Technol., 45(5). https://www.onepetro.org/journal-paper/PETSOC-06-05-02.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
15. Ko, K.M., B.H. Chon, S.B. Jang and H.Y. Jang, 2014. Surfactant flooding characteristics of dodecyl alkyl sulfate for enhanced oil recovery. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(1): 228-233. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1226086X13001494.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
16. Kristiansen, T.S. and T. Holt, 1992. Properties of flowing foam in porous media containing oil. Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma. https: //www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-24182-MS.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
17. Liu, Y., R.B. Grigg and R.K. Svec, 2005. CO2 foam behavior: Influence of temperature, pressure and concentration of surfactant. Proceedings of the SPE Production Operations Symposium, OK, USA. https://www. onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-94307-MS.
    
18. Ma, K., L. Cui, Y. Dong, T. Wang, C. Da, G.J. Hirasaki and S.L. Biswal, 2013. Adsorption of cationic and anionic surfactants on natural and synthetic carbonate materials. J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 408: 164-172. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 23957928.
    Direct Link
19. Melrose, J.C. and C.F. Bradner, 1974. Role of capillary forces in determining microscopic displacement efficiency for oil recovery by waterflooding. J. Can. Petrol. Technol., 13(4): 54-62. https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=F2wxxHmpWjgC&pg=PA417&lpg=PA417&dq=Role+of+capillary+forces+in+determining+microscopic+displacement+efficiency+for+oil+recovery+by+waterflooding&source=bl&ots=JWdur_KGYS&sig=ghDRiKO0Zl2uuYIS3yhzhDGLLd8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiUzerZvr3JAhVDkY4KHYrrBJwQ6AEIPTAG#v=onepage&q=Role%20of%20capillary%20forces%20in%20determining%20microscopic%20displacement%20efficiency%20for%20oil%20recovery%20by%20waterflooding&f=false.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
20. Romsted, L.S., 2014. Surfactant Science and Technology: Retrospects and Prospects. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York. https://books.google.com. pk/books?isbn=1439882959.
    Direct Link
21. Schramm, L.L. and K. Mannhardt, 1996. The effect of wettability on foam sensitivity to crude oil in porous media. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 15(1): 101-113. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0920410595000682.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
22. Stevenson, P., 2012. Foam Engineering Fundamentals and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK. https://books.google.com.pk/ books?id=nxO7xkQ0wFsC&pg=PT733&dq=Foam+Engineering+Fundamentals+and+Applications&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjlvLiVwL3JAhUCS44KHRnoDSYQuwUIOzAG#v=onepage&q=Foam%20Engineering%20Fundamentals%20and%20Applications&f=false.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
23. Suffridge, F.E., K.T. Raterman and G.C. Russell, 1989. Foam performance under reservoir conditions. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Soc. Pet., San Antonio, TX. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ SPE-19691-MS.
    CrossRef    
24. Zhu, T., A. Strycker, C.J. Raible and K. Vineyard, 1998. Foams for mobility control and improved sweep efficiency in gas flooding. Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 277-286. https://www.onepetro. org/conference-paper/SPE-39680-MS.
    Direct Link
25. Zhu, Y., G. Xu, H. Gong, D. Wu and Y. Wang, 2009. Production of ultra-low interfacial tension between crude oil and mixed brine solution of triton X-100 and its oligomer tyloxapol with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide induced by hydrolyzed polyacrylamide. Colloid. Surface. A, 332(2-3): 90-97. http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0927775708005980.
    Direct Link

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.