Home           Contact us           FAQs           
 
   Journal Page   |   Aims & Scope   |   Author Guideline   |   Editorial Board   |   Search
    Abstract
2012 (Vol. 4, Issue: 14)
Article Information:

Critical Analysis of Criteria-Based Assessment and Grading in Architecture Education (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia as Case Study)

Badiossadat Hassanpour, Nangkula Utaberta and Azami Zaharim
Corresponding Author:  Badiossadat Hassanpour 

Key words:  Architecture education, criteria-based assessment, grading, , , ,
Vol. 4 , (14): 2046-2054
Submitted Accepted Published
December 13, 2011 January 13, 2012 July 15, 2012
Abstract:

Education is a contiguous and consecutive process. Thereby learning skills and knowledge in any context, requires strong and powerful academic basis. To reach this target, evaluation as a means to recognize studentís learning level and making decisions for further educating steps seems essential. All the Educational systems have sort of official examination, assessment or grading policy to measure studentís learning stage. In the typical policy, students are told clearly about the proposed assessment program and the relative weightings of the various components and they are given timely and helpful feedback after each assessment stage. Internationally, in these decades, universities and educators have become increasingly committed to making assessment and grading more effective in promoting student learning. Appraisal methods and grading systems in studio based educating systems, such as architecture, more than other majors and fields needs attention and scrutiny. Because transmitting the success amount of solving ill-defined problems in design studios to grading symbols are more difficult than multiple choice tests and even open ended questions. The primary interest of this study is in grading methods that claim to be criteria-based. This study tries to hybrid the criteria based models to introduce a new appraisal method in evaluating architectural projects in universities, based on a review of the most common grading policies.
Abstract PDF HTML
  Cite this Reference:
Badiossadat Hassanpour, Nangkula Utaberta and Azami Zaharim, 2012. Critical Analysis of Criteria-Based Assessment and Grading in Architecture Education (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia as Case Study).  Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(14): 2046-2054.
    Advertise with us
 
ISSN (Online):  2040-7467
ISSN (Print):   2040-7459
Submit Manuscript
   Current Information
   Sales & Services
   Contact Information
  Executive Managing Editor
  Email: admin@maxwellsci.com
  Publishing Editor
  Email: support@maxwellsci.com
  Account Manager
  Email: faisalm@maxwellsci.com
  Journal Editor
  Email: admin@maxwellsci.com
  Press Department
  Email: press@maxwellsci.com
Home  |  Contact us  |  About us  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009. MAXWELL Science Publication, a division of MAXWELLl Scientific Organization. All rights reserved