Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology

Increased Production of Coenzyme Q10 from Genetic Engineered Rhodobacter sphaeroides Overexpressing UbiG

Abstract

The aim of this study was to increase the Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) yield from Rhodobacter sphaeroides via genetic engineering pathway. CoQ10 plays important roles in many biological processes and has been proven to be effective in the treatment of many diseases. In the present study, the ubiG gene located in CoQ10 biosynthesis pathway was effectively overexpressed in Rb. sphaeroides to increase CoQ10 production. The growth of host cells was slightly influenced by overexpressing ubiG. The crude CoQ10 production was enhanced by 58.31% compared to that from the control. The ubiG mRNA level was significantly increased compared to the wild type harboring empty vector as measured by qRT-PCR. Moreover, the crude CoQ10 exhibited strong anti-oxidant activity as measured in vivo by zone of inhibition assay.

Keywords:


Introduction

CoQ10 (2,3-dimethoxyl, 5-methyl, 6-decaisoprene parabenzoquinone) is a lipid-soluble material wide-spread in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, which could be used in the treatment of many diseases. It has been proposed that CoQ10 could effectively protect rat cardiomyocytes against cisplatin-induced cardiotoxicity via attenuating oxidative stress (Zhao, 2019). Yousef and co-workers suggest that CoQ10 has beneficial effects against neuronal damage induced by lead acetate (PbAc) through its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic and neuromodulatory activities (Yousef et al., 2019). Jahangard and co-workers suggest that CoQ10 is considered a safe and effective strategy for treatment of patients with Bipolar disorder during their depressive phase (Jahangard et al., 2019). Treatment by CoQ10 will reduce p53, Puma and Bax mRNA expression levels and increase Bcl-2 mRNA expression levels and thus mitigates ionizing radiation-induced testicular damage through inhibition of oxidative stress and mitochondria-mediated apoptotic cell death (Said et al., 2019). Moreover, CoQ10 possesses strong anti-oxidant capacity and thus can protect phosphate, lips, proteins and DNA (Cluis et al., 2007; Kaci et al., 2018; Rizvi et al., 2015).

Production of adequate and low cost CoQ10 is required because of its applications in many fields related to people’s health. Currently, CoQ10 is normally produced by three approaches including chemical synthesis, semi-chemical synthesis and microbial fermentation. Compared to other two ways, microbial fermentation is becoming more and more popular. Rb. sphaeroides is considered a promising microorganism for producing natural functional CoQ10 (Zahiri et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2017). The whole genome of this bacterium has been completely sequenced. The biosynthesis pathway for the formation of CoQ10 in Rb. sphaeroides includes three pathways, the 2-C-Methyl-D-Erythritol 4-Phosphate (MEP) pathway, the shikimate pathway and the Quinine Modification Pathway (QMP). ubiG is an oxygen-methyltransferase, participating in two steps for the synthesis of CoQ10 in Rb. sphaeroides. ubiG will catalyzes 2-Decaprenyl-6-hydroxyphenol into 2-Decaprenyl-6-methoxyphenol and catalyzes the formation of CoQ10 from 2-Decaprenyl-3-methyl-5-hydroxy-6-methoxy-1,4-benzoquinone, which is the last step for the biosyntheisi of CoQ10 in Rb. sphaeroides (Lu et al., 2015).

Rb. sphaeroides is considered an excellent model for studying photosynthesis and membrane development (Kiley and Kaplan, 1987). LH1 is one of the most important photosynthetic apparatus encoded by puf operon (Hu et al., 2002). puf operon promoter is normally regulated by oxygen tension and light intensity (Hu, et al., 2010). A powerful promoter and optimal growth conditions are very important for largest production of CoQ10 in genetic engineered Rb. sphaeroides.

Up to date, enhanced production of CoQ10 from Rb. sphaeroides by overexpression of ubiG under puf operon promoter and micro-aerobic growth conditions has not been reported. In the present study, the ubiG was overexpressed in Rb. sphaeroides initiated by puf operon promoter. The production of CoQ10 from the genetic engineered strain was enhanced by over 58%, which was increased much higher than reported literature (Lu et al., 2015). The present study will promote the application of Rb. sphaeroides for large scale production of functional CoQ10.


Materials And Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions: Rb. sphaeroides strains were grown at 30°C in malate minimal medium (Remes et al., 2014). Growth under micro-aerobic conditions was performed as described in our previous study (Hu et al., 2010). E. coli strains were cultivated vigorously in flasks at 37°C in Luria-Bertani medium. Antibiotics were added to the growth media at the following concentrations when necessary: 200 μg/mL ampicillin, 20 μg/mL tetracycline for E. coli and 1.5 μg/mL tetracycline for Rb. sphaeroides.

Construction of DNA plasmids: The ubiG was amplified from Rb. sphaeroides by Prime STAR HS DNA polymerase (TAKARA) with the primers of ubiG-F (5’-GCTCTAGAATGGAATCGTCCAGCACC ATCGACC-3’) and ubiG-R (5’-CGGGATCCTCAGC TGCGCCGCACGC-3’) and ligated into cloning vector pMD18-T (TAKARA) and subsequently sequenced. The ubiG fragment was cut from pMD18-ubiG plasmid by XbaI and BamHI and purified by gel extraction and ligated into pRKpuf (Hendrischk et al., 2009) digested by XbaI-BamHI, producing pRKubiG overexpression vector.

Construction of genetic engineered Rb. sphaeorides: The constructed plasmid pRKubiG was transferred into Rb. sphaeroides 2.4.1 by using the E. coli S17-1 as the donor as described in the previous study (Hu et al., 2010).

Production of crude CoQ10 from the genetic engineered strain: Colonies of the conjugant were selected and cultivated under micro-aerobic conditions in the dark at 30°C until OD660 reached approximately 0.6. Pre-cultures were respectively inoculated into 100-mL flasks containing malate minimal media with 1.5 µg/mL tetracycline at the ratio of 1% and grown under micro-aerobic conditions in the dark at 30°C for 48 h. Crude CoQ10 was extracted and quantified as described by Chen et al. (2006), respectively.

Quantitative RT-PCR: Total RNA was isolated from cell cultures by using the Tiangen Bacteria RNA Isolation Kit (#DPN430) according to the manufacturer's instructions. mRNA from genetic engineered strain and wild type strain harboring empty vector was considered sample mRNA and control mRNA, respectively. To further confirm the absence of DNA, PCR was performed targeting gloB (RSP_0799). qRT-PCR was performed as described previously (Remes et al., 2014) in a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real Time system. Primers used for qRT-PCR were ubiG-real-F (5’-GCAAAGCTCCATGC CGAG-3’) and ubiG-real-R (5’-GTCGAGCAGATCATCAGG-3’). Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized to the reference gene rpoZ (Zeller et al., 2007) according to the formula given by Pfaffl (2001).

Zone of inhibition assay: Zone of inhibition assay was performed as described in our previous study (Zhao et al., 2019). Filters soaked with 5 µL of 700 mM H2O2 were placed on the top of the plates.

Data analysis: All experiments were repeated for 3 times. Turkey test and GraphPad Prism software were used to analyze the data trend.


Results And Discussion

Construction of the expression vector: The expression vector used in this study was constructed as shown in Fig. 1. ubiG is an important catalyzed enzyme in the ubiquinone pathway for the biosynthesis of CoQ10 in Rb. sphaeroides (Lu et al., 2015). It is an oxygen-methyltransferase, involved in catalyzing 2-Decaprenyl-6-hydroxyphenol into 2-Decaprenyl-6-methoxyphenol and catalyzing the 2-Decaprenyl-3-methyl-5-hydroxy-6-methoxy-1,4benzoquinone into CoQ10. puf operon is comprised of pufB, pufA, pufL, pufM and pufX, encoding the LH1 and reaction center in Rb. sphaeroides (Eisenhardt et al., 2018; Gong and Kaplan, 1996). The puf operon promoter initiates two transcripts, a 2.7-kb transcript for pufBALMX and a 0.5-kb transcript for pufBA (Gong et al., 1994). Under the micro-aerobic growth conditions or optimal light intensity, the puf operon promoter exhibits strongest activity. Moreover, the pRK415 vector (Chen et al., 2019) is a broad host range expression vector.

Construction of the genetic engineered strain overexpressing ubiG: The constructed expression vector was mobilized into Rb. sphaeroides by conjugation by using E. coli S17-1. The growth curve for the wild type, 2.4.1/pRKpuf and 2.4.1/pRKubiG were constructed to demonstrate whether the growth was influenced by overexpression of ubiG, as revealed in Fig. 2. It was obvious that overexpression of ubiG slightly influenced the growth of the host cells. In the first 20 h, growth rates for the three different strains were nearly the same since the growth curve was overlapped. However, at the stationary phase, significant difference between the wild type and 2.4.1/pRKubiG at the time point of 48 h was observed. Similarly, remarkable differences between 2.4.1/pRKpuf and 2.4.1/pRKubiG at the time points of 22 and 48 h were observed. Although it has been proposed that the CoQ10 plays very important roles in energy generation and many other processes, which are important for cell’s survival (Zahiri et al., 2006). In the present study, production of CoQ10 possibly did not strongly affect the growth of the host cells.

The crude CoQ10 was extracted from the genetic engineered strain, as observed in Fig. 3. The yield of crude CoQ10 from wild type 2.4.1 and 2.4.1/pRKpuf was around 26.30 and 25.869 mg/L, respectively. However, the crude CoQ10 production from the genetic engineered 2.4.1/pRKubiG was 41.47 mg/L. Compared to the wild type, the CoQ10 production in 2.4.1/pRKubiG was increased by 58.31%, which was much higher than the rate described in reported study (Lu et al., 2015). It could be concluded that overexpression of the ubiG could significantly increase the crude CoQ10 production under micro-aerobic growth conditions initiated by the puf operon promoter.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis for ubiG: qRT-PCR was employed to test the ubiG mRNA expression levels to further describe the reasons resulted in the enhancement of CoQ10 from the genetic engineered 2.4.1/pRKubiG, as seen in Fig. 4. As expected, the ubiG mRNA level was significantly upregulated, with log2 fold change of approximately 13.63. ubiG is an oxygen-methyltransferase, involved in catalyzing 2-decaprenyl-6-hydroxyphenol into 2-decaprenyl-6-methoxyphenol and catalyzing the 2-decaprenyl-3-methyl-5-hydroxy-6-methoxy-1,4 benzoquinone into CoQ10 (Lu et al., 2015). The ubiG enzyme expression level should be upregulated because of the increased ubiG mRNA expression levels and crude CoQ10 production.

Anti-oxidant activity: From the zone of inhibition experiment, it could be concluded that the strain 2.4.1/pRKubiG possessed much higher anti-oxidant activity than that of the control strain 2.4.1/pRKpuf, as revealed in Fig. 5. The H2O2 is a normally used oxidant produced ˖OH radical by Fenton reaction (Fischbacher et al., 2017). Obviously, the size of zone of inhibition for 2.4.1/pRKubiG was much smaller than that of 2.4.1/pRKpuf, indicating that the strain 2.4.1/pRKubiG was less sensitive to H2O2 than that of the control strain 2.4.1/pRKpuf. The genetic engineered strain 2.4.1/pRKubiE was constructed in our previous study (Tang et al., 2019), which produced more CoQ10 than the present genetic engineered strain 2.4.1/pRKubiG and possessed a little bit smaller size of zone of inhibition. The zone of inhibition assay indicated that the crude CoQ10 was functional and thus possessed the potential for commercial utility in food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries after further purification.

figure1
Fig. 1: Schematic representation of ubiG overexpression vector. The ubiG gene was activated by the strong puf operon promoter from Rb. Sphaeroides
figure2
Fig. 2: A Growth curve of wild type 2.4.1, 2.4.1/pRKpuf and 2.4.1/pRKubiG. Overexpression of ubiG slightly influenced the growth of host cells
figure3
Fig. 3: Quantitative measurement of crude CoQ10
The CoQ10 from 2.4.1/pRKubiG was significantly higher than that in wild type 2.4.1 and 2.4.1/pRKpuf; **: A highly significant change (p≤0.01)
figure4
Fig. 4: Quantitative analysis of ubiG mRNA expression levels.
The ubiG mRNA expression level in 2.4.1/pRKubiG was significantly increased with log2 fold change of 13.63 compared to that in the control 2.4.1/pRKpuf
figure5
Fig. 5: Zone of inhibition assay for 2.4.1/pRKpuf and 2.4.1/pRKubiG.
The zone diameter for 2.4.1/pRKubiG and 2.4.1/pRKpuf was 14.500 and 18.667 mm, respectively; **: A highly significant change (p ≤ 0.01)

Conclusion

In the present study, we constructed the genetic engineered Rb. sphaeroides strain 2.4.1/pRKubiG to increase the CoQ10 production. Production of the crude CoQ10 from 2.4.1/pRKubiG was increased by 58.31% and ubiG mRNA was significantly upregulated. Moreover, the genetic engineered strain 2.4.1/pRKubiG exhibited more stronger anti-oxidant activity because of the much more production of crude CoQ10.


Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Project of Sichuan Science and Technology Department (2018NZ0150), National Modern Agriculture Industry/System Sichuan Live Pig Innovation Team (SCSZTD-3-007). We thank Prof. Dr. Gabriele Klug (Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany) for supplying the expression vector pRKpuf.

Conflict Of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Author Details

1Meat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610106, China


References

Chen, D., Y. Han and Z. Gu, 2006. Application of statistical methodology to the optimization of fermentative medium for carotenoids production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Process Biochem., 41(8): 1773-1778.
Chen, K., X. Chen, H. Xue, P. Zhang, W. Fang, X. Chen and W. Ling, 2019. Coenzyme Q10 attenuates high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through activation of the AMPK pathway. Food Funct., 10(2): 814-823.
Cluis, C.P., A.M. Burja and V.J. Martin, 2007. Current prospects for the production of coenzyme Q10 in microbes. Trends Biotechnol., 25(11): 514-521.
Eisenhardt, K.M.H., C.M. Reuscher and G. Klug, 2018. PcrX, an sRNA derived from the 3'-UTR of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides puf operon modulates expression of puf genes encoding proteins of the bacterial photosynthetic apparatus. Mol. Microbiol., 110(3): 325-334.
Fischbacher, A., C. von Sonntag and T.C. Schmidt, 2017. Hydroxyl radical yields in the Fenton process under various pH, ligand concentrations and hydrogen peroxide/Fe(II) ratios. Chemosphere, 182: 738-744.
Gong, L. and S. Kaplan, 1996. Translational control of puf operon expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. Microbiology, 142(Pt 8): 2057-2069.
Gong L., J.K. Lee and S. Kaplan, 1994. The Q gene of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Its role in puf operon expression and spectral complex assembly. J. Bacteriol., 176(10): 2946-2961.
Hendrischk, A.K., S.W. Fruhwirth, J. Moldt, R. Pokorny, S. Metz, G. Kaiser, A. Jager, A. Batschauer and G. Klug, 2009. A cryptochrome-like protein is involved in the regulation of photosynthesis genes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Mol. Microbiol., 74(4): 990-1003.
Hu, X., T. Ritz, A. Damjanovic, F. Autenrieth and K. Schulten, 2002. Photosynthetic apparatus of purple bacteria. Q. Rev. Biophys., 35(1): 1-62.
Hu, Z., Z. Zhao, Y. Pan, Y. Tu and G. Chen, 2010. A powerful hybrid puc operon promoter tightly regulated by both IPTG and low oxygen level. Biochemistry (Mosc), 75(4): 519-522.
Jahangard, L., F. Yasrebifar, M. Haghighi, A. Ranjbar and M. Mehrpooya, 2019. Influence of adjuvant coenzyme Q10 on inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers in patients with bipolar disorders during the depressive episode. Mol. Biol. Rep., 46(5): 5333-5343.
Kaci, M., A. Belhaffef, S. Meziane, G. Dostert, P. Menu, E. Velot, S. Desobry and E. Arab-Tehrany, 2018. Nanoemulsions and topical creams for the safe and effective delivery of lipophilic antioxidant coenzyme Q10. Colloid. Surface B, 167: 165-175.
Kiley, P.J. and S. Kaplan, 1987. Cloning, DNA sequence, and expression of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides light-harvesting B800-850-alpha and B800-850-beta genes. J. Bacteriol., 169(7): 3268-3275.
Lu, W., L. Ye, X. Lv, W. Xie, J. Gu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhu, A. Li and H. Yu, 2015. Identification and elimination of metabolic bottlenecks in the quinone modification pathway for enhanced coenzyme Q10 production in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Metab. Eng., 29: 208-216.
Pfaffl, M.W., 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res., 29(9): e45.
Remes, B., B.A. Berghoff, K.U. Forstner and G. Klug, 2014. Role of oxygen and the OxyR protein in the response to iron limitation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. BMC Genomics, 15: 794.
Rizvi, A., S. Chibber and I. Naseem, 2015. Cu(II)-vitamin D interaction leads to free radical-mediated cellular DNA damage: A novel putative mechanism for its selective cytotoxic action against malignant cells. Tumour. Biol., 36(3): 1695-1700.
Said, R.S., H.A. Mohamed and M.M. Kamal, 2019. Coenzyme Q10 mitigates ionizing radiation-induced testicular damage in rats through inhibition of oxidative stress and mitochondria-mediated apoptotic cell death. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 383: 114780.
Tang, K., J. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, G. Wang and Z.P. Zhao, 2019. Production of functional coenzyme Q10 from genetic engineered Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol., 17(3): 48-53.
Yousef, A.O.S., A.A. Fahad, A.E.A. Moneim, D.M. Metwally, M.F. El-khadragy and R.B. Kassab, 2019. The neuroprotective role of coenzyme Q10 against lead acetate-induced neurotoxicity is mediated by antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic activities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16(16): 2895.
Zahiri, H.S., K.A. Noghabi and Y.C. Shin, 2006. Biochemical characterization of the decaprenyl diphosphate synthase of Rhodobacter sphaeroides for coenzyme Q10 production. Appl. Microbiol. Biot., 73(4): 796-806.
Zeller, T., M.A. Mraheil, O.V. Moskvin, K. Li, M. Gomelsky and G. Klug, 2007. Regulation of hydrogen peroxide-dependent gene expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides: regulatory functions of OxyR. J. Bacteriol., 189(10): 3784-3792.
Zhao, L., 2019. Protective effects of trimetazidine and coenzyme Q10 on cisplatin-induced cardiotoxicity by alleviating oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Anatol. J. Cardiol., 22(5): 232-239.
Zhao, Z., T. Peng, J. Oh, J. Glaeser, L. Weber, Q. Li and G. Klug, 2019. A response regulator of the OmpR family is part of the regulatory network controlling the oxidative stress response of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Environ. Microbiol. Rep., 11(2): 118-128.
Zhu, Y., L. Ye, Z. Chen, W. Hu, Y. Shi, J. Chen, C. Wang, Y. Li, W. Li and H. Yu, 2017. Synergic regulation of redox potential and oxygen uptake to enhance production of coenzyme Q10 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Enzyme. Microb. Technol., 101: 36-43.

Rights and permissions

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Cite this Article

Received
Accepted
Published
December 9, 2019
April 18, 2020
August 25, 2020

DOI: http://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.18.6051